Search for: "Acie v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 49
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2013, 12:13 pm by Gene Quinn
(ACI) appealed several rulings made by the United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas in favor of St. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 4:04 am
  Last week, in State v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 6:56 pm
("ACI") appeals from the final judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 5:11 am by Ben
He is teaching both in Hungarian and English language at the Szeged Law School, and he has delivered lectures at universities in Finland, the United States, France, Germany and Russia, and presented papers on conferences in Hungary, Germany, Canada, United States, Austria, Finland, Indonesia and France. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 7:16 pm
State of Indiana, decided 3-2 - "For the reasons explained in Membres v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 12:57 pm
Jude filed its complaint in the United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas on October 22, 2008, alleging that ACI infringed several of its patents, including the Janzen patent and the Fowler patents. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 6:03 am by Kevin LaCroix
    Here is Angelo’s guest post::     On June 10, 2011, Judge Barbara Jones of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York issued a decision in a case entitled SEC v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 6:03 am by Kevin LaCroix
    Here is Angelo’s guest post::     On June 10, 2011, Judge Barbara Jones of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York issued a decision in a case entitled SEC v. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
– Discussion of IPFrontline.com article ‘Understanding Intellectual Property Value’: (IP finance), How to make sure your IP strategy plan is not doomed to failure: (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Improve venture capital returns with IP portfolio management: (Ezine @rticles)   Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / Brands Trade mark strategy – counterintuitive names: (IP Thinktank), ICANN Intellectual Property Constituency paper on sunrise mechanisms for… [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 2:30 am
The latter is necessary to prevent that the joint or parallel application of the private copying exception and of the reprography exception by Member States ends up being inconsistent.The CJEU concluded that Articles 5(2)(a) (b) preclude, in principle [but there may be exceptions pursuant to what is stated sub para 56], national legislations which introduce an undifferentiated system for recovering fair compensation which also covers the copying of sheet music.The… [read post]